We’re not using the M-word

Impulse exhibition visit! Yaaaay!

Conway Hall is one of those hidden-away places that, again, I’ve always been curious about but never really bothered to look for. It’s the headquarters of the South Place Ethical Society, located in a corner of Red Lion Square, Bloomsbury. The Society was founded in 1793 and specialises in, as you might imagine, discussions of ethics. It rejected God in 1888 and these days advertises itself as a haven for free thinkers. A free thinker is like an atheist, except without causing Internet flame wars.

What caught my eye was an exhibition called “Evolution – the fossils say YES!” Now, evolutionary biology is one of those things that I find endlessly fascinating. At the risk of getting all Richard Dawkins on yo collective ass, there’s so much about the world that can be explained via evolution, from the strange animals around the world to aspects of human behaviour.

We’re quite fortunate in Britain that we don’t have a fundamentalist movement in the sense that you find in the USA – it makes me want to punch something that someone in the 21st century can make it to the stage of being a candidate for Vice President and yet still believe the world was created in a week six thousand years ago using superpowers. Sarah Palin, I’m looking at you, you oil-loving, polar-bear-hating, only-hot-compared-to-other-politicians-when-viewed-objectively epsilon semi-moron. In this country, people who don’t believe in the theory of evolution are largely regarded in the same way as flat-earthers. Even the Archbishop of Canterbury acknowledges that the evidence in favour of evolution rather than creation is overwhelming. I myself was brought up as a Christian, but my parents took me to the Natural History Museum and explained that, straight-up, humans evolved from apes. Not monkeys, by the way. We’re not using the M-word.

This, I think, was the major problem with the exhibition – it was largely preaching to the converted. The sort of person who believes in creationism is generally narrow-minded and totally unwilling to think for themselves. If you present them with evidence of evolution, they’ll either deny it or claim it’s insufficient.

Then they’ll throw out phrases like “Well it’s only the Theory of Evolution,” totally misunderstanding what a theory is (actually, “theory” in scientific terms actually denotes virtual certainty). Or they’ll use the M-word because, ha ha, monkeys are silly! You’re silly because you think you’re a monkey haw haw! And when you’ve really got them on the ropes, they’ll shrug their shoulders and play the “Well, I’m only trying to save you from Hell” card.

What I’m basically saying is, the sort of person who disbelieves evolution to the extent that they would need such an exhibition is exactly the sort of person who would never set foot in a Humanist establishment like Conway Hall.

Fossils illustrating the gradual development of the horse's leg. I mean, not the same horse, obviously.

Fossils illustrating the gradual development of the horse's leg. I mean, not the same horse, obviously.

IMG_0852

Pre-Cambrian fossils. The gent on the bottom right is a three-armed creature with no known genetic relatives.

The exhibition had a few other flaws as well. Some of these, to be fair, I suspect were a result of my arriving at lunchtime on Monday, which is not exactly boom time for the tourist industry. Still, it was kind of annoying to have to peer over a set of folding chairs to read about the Cambrian Explosion, which is one of the most awesome eras in the development of life. Unfortunately it wasn’t an actual explosion, but did involve some utterly insane life forms. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambrian_explosion for details – seriously, this stuff makes Pokemon look dull and pedestrian.

The displays could also have done with a proofreader. This may seem a little anal retentive, but I’m of the school that believes that if you’re producing a scholarly display, it looks unprofessional to haev typpos in the fnished exibit.

Another problem, I think, is that this is such a huge subject by its very nature that no exhibition this small can hope to cover it in any real detail. When you have only one board on Pre-Cambrian life, there’s only so much you can convey. That being said, it was a pleasant enough way to pass a bit of time in m’lunch break and is worth popping in if you’re in the area. Particularly as it’s free.

Oh, piss off.

Oh, piss off.

Further reading

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/book_extracts/article6805656.ece

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Bloomsbury, History, London, Museums

2 responses to “We’re not using the M-word

  1. Good point about creationists being like flat-earthers.

    Alfred Wallace, one of the discoverers of evolution, was also fond of publicly discrediting all the nonsense claims of flat-earthers. Unfortunatley he hadn’t realised just how fanatical and illogical they really were.

    One (in)famous incident involved a bet between Wallace and a leading flat-earther to measure curvature of a body of water. The flat-earther cheated, got caught out, and was disqualified, so Wallace was declared to have won by default.

    But the disqualified flat-earther sued him, because the bet was supposed to be null and void if either party cheated, according to the pre-agreed terms of the bet, and so nobody could win by default. When it went to court, the judge agreed, and Wallace lost the case. Flat earth organisations rushed to produce propaganda celebrating this massive “victory” over the round-earthers, conveniently ignoring the fact that HADN’T won the original bet, despite their attempts at cheating…

    Creationists show exactly the same fanatical ability to ignore common sense and reality. It’s scary!

    • TGW

      Yep, arguments with them tend be quite predictable. They make a point, you refute it, they make another point, you refute it, they make a third point, you refute it, then they’ll illustrate their point with a Bible quote about how only a fool wouldn’t believe the words of the Bible (funny they should say that), then they’ll go back to the first point. Anyway, a fine place for creationist silliness is http://www.drdino.com/, whose founder is currently in jail for tax fraud. Oh Kent Hovind, you silly, silly man.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s